The best Nikon wide-angle lenses

If you are following this blog, you know that there is already an article on the topic of how to choose a wide-angle lens and another one about landscape photography lenses, which mainly mentions these lenses. Nevertheless, here the goal is to present the ones that I consider to be the best and more particularly why I consider them as such. After the article on the best Canon wide-angle lenses, here is my selection on the best Nikon wide-angle lenses.

Of course, some of these lenses are mentioned in the other two articles, but I hadn’t presented their characteristics in detail, nor what makes them the best choices at the moment. If you’ve already thought about it, you may have already chosen another one that may not be in the article. If that choice is well thought out and meets the criteria you have set for yourself, you do not, of course, have to change your mind unless one of the choices mentioned proves to be more interesting.

Wide angles are very appreciated as they cover a large amount of scenery and they are useful when there is not enough distance between the lens and the subject. They also allow you to accentuate the relief of a scene as long as the framing is done conscientiously and gives an impression of immensity. Finally, they can be chosen to use distortion to accentuate the importance of a shot or element in relation to the others.

For all these lenses, a lot of research was necessary; I was able to try some of them but obviously I could not test them all. It was therefore necessary for some of the lenses to compile the numerous tests and opinions in order to come up with the most objective ranking possible. You will therefore find an illustration of these lenses, some extra specifications and my appreciation for each one. For each format (APS-C and Full Frame), I will also mention a few alternatives because many of them can be considered as top of the range and therefore a bit excessive or too expensive for some of you.

I have gathered my choices according to the size of the sensor to simplify the matter, especially since mounted on a full frame sensor, APS-C lenses do not cover the whole sensor and mounted on an APS-C, full frame lenses do not cover the same field of view. I also don’t intend to go into technical considerations such as vignetting or distortion that you can easily find on test sites with precise numbers, especially since most of these defects can be rectified by the body or otherwise by a processing software.

I have written a complete article on the subject that explains how to choose your wide-angle lens. So I won’t repeat everything again. However, I will briefly brush over the criteria you need to take into account when choosing your lens.

The range of cameras at Nikon remains very wide, from the D3500 body (amateur) to the D500 which is an example of a professional body. In general, the optics manufactured for Nikon APS-C bodies are lighter and more compact than those manufactured for full-frame bodies. I present above the best Nikon lenses for APS-C body.

By the way, if you are looking for wide-angle alternatives and/or want to have a good idea of what Nikon offers for its APS-C format (DX format from Nikon), do not hesitate to have a look at our dedicated page.

Here are in my opinion the 4 best Nikon lenses for an APS-C body:

1. Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD
2. Nikon AF-P DX 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR
3. Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX II AF 11-16 mm f/2.8
4. Sigma AF 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM

Details of the main technical characteristics of these 4 lenses can be found in the table below.

This new version of the Tamron 10-24mm stands out from the previous one by its stabilization and from the 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G proposed by Nikon. This Tamron wide-angle lens benefits from a good construction in line with the recent Tamron lenses for a relatively light weight.

The maximum aperture of this lens is not very large, but for landscape images with large depth of field, it won’t be a concern, not even on light since its stabilization will help more than an f/2.8 aperture in many cases. It delivers a very good image quality in the center but it will be better to close the diaphragm to obtain a better homogeneity. Considering its price, features and performance, it is for me the most interesting wide-angle lens for Nikon APS-C bodies at the moment.

Recently released, this wide-angle lens for APS-C will delight fans of brightness, delivering good quality images and stabilization that can often prove useful. Its focal range matches very well with standards such as 18-55mm or 17-50mm.

Compared to the Tamron, it decreases a little bit in terms of of maximum aperture, but gains in weight. You will also have to close the diaphragm, especially at the shortest focal lengths, to gain homogeneity, but at the longest focal lengths and once closed, the quality is excellent. Added to that with its very affordable price, you have here an excellent alternative to Tamron if you accept the reduction of the aperture.

With a f/2.8 aperture and Tokina’s usual construction that uses less “plastic”, this new version of the Tokina 11-16mm is a very good choice, even better than the previous ones if you have the use of a large aperture.

For night photography or astrophotography, its large aperture offers great possibilities. The quality at full aperture is certainly not the highest, but it improves quickly when closing. Don’t forget that it is an f/2.8 so closing at f/4 or f/5.6 will sometimes prove better than Tamron and Nikon.

The last ultra-wide-angle lens recommended for a Nikon APS-C DSLR, this Sigma appears to be good choice for a good budget and often recommended.

Its maximum aperture is less important than the Tokina f/2.8, but it has the merit of being constant, unlike the Tamron and Nikon. It’s very appreciated for value in APS-C.

There are a few other possibilities for Nikon APS-C wide-angle lenses, but the lenses mentioned above are, in my opinion, the best recommendations. Another possibility would be to look at the Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 Pro Dx which also offers a large fixed aperture at f/2.8 and a slightly wider focal range than the 11-16mm of the same brand. The table below summarizes the main characteristics of the lenses mentioned above.

Regarding wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle lenses for Nikon full-frame bodies, the choice will be much wider, some people even put forward this argument to encourage choosing full-frame rather than APS-C because at the same focal length, the full-frame is wider and it is therefore “easier” to design wide-angle lenses for this format. Here is a selection of my opinion of the five best zooms and the five best fixed focal lengths in this category. However, I also present below the possible alternatives.

Here are below the 10 lenses (5 zooms and 5 fixed focal length) that I consider the best for a Nikon Full Frame camera:

If you want to compare the main specifications of the 10 lenses, I have summarized everything in the table below for the wide-angle zooms and in the following table for the fixed wide-angle lenses.

Sigma’s 24-35mm f/2 art is the first full-frame zoom to offer an f/2 aperture. Its focal range is short, too short for some who would have preferred it to start at 20mm or end at 50mm but that would have meant extra weight and dimensions. It is basically designed to give access to a 24, 28 and 35mm in one lens with the same quality as have the best fixed focal lengths.

Sigma has succeeded, since this zoom offers a remarkable image quality at all focal lengths at full aperture. Its quality/price ratio is excellent since it is offered at a price below 1000$, which might seem high but would certainly have been much more if it had been designed by Nikon or Canon. Nevertheless, its limited focal range makes it less versatile and therefore less interesting in many situations compared to the lenses mentioned below.

For me it is currently the best wide angle and ultra-wide-angle lens for a Nikon full frame sensor. This Tamron lens is up to the level of the high-end Canon and Nikon lenses and even offers new features.

In addition to being of a quality close to the latter, and not necessarily in the worse sense, with a constant f/2.8 aperture, it also has a stabilization that further increases its range of possibilities in low light as well as in handheld video. Not to spoil anything, it’s also cheaper with a very high level construction, ready to face any conditions.

Sigma has taken over the focal length range and aperture of the famous Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G but has not integrated a stabilizer, which is usual at Sigma for these kinds of lenses. It is already a high level reference and does not let itself be impressed by the mythical 14-24mm of the brand.

Its quality is excellent, especially at the longest focal lengths, from the full aperture. Compared to the Nikon, it remains excellent but for a softer price. It’s the ideal lens to pair with a 24-70mm f/2.8 of the same brand, especially if you have the USB dock allowing you to customize them.

For those who don’t need an f/2.8 aperture, this 16-35mm is a very good option. Compared to most f/2.8 zooms, this 16-35mm gains a stabilization that can again be interesting in situations where the f/2.8 aperture would not bring as much to the table.

Although its quality is not of the same level as the previous ones, it remains very good and even excellent when closing the diaphragm with its stabilization that is very efficient. The loss of the f/2.8 aperture, however, allows a significant loss in weight and dimensions, which will be pleasant especially with bodies such as the D610 or the D750.

Among the Nikon wide-angle lenses, this Sigma is one of the few to offer a focal range starting at 12mm. Canon users can choose the 11-24mm f/4L but at a price much higher than the Sigma.

It delivers excellent image quality at full aperture, but its price, weight, dimensions and lack of stabilization make it less interesting than the 16-35mm f/4G if you don’t have an absolute need for focal lengths between 12 and 16mm.

If you are interested, I suggest you to compare the main specifications of the 5 wide-angle zoom lenses mentioned in the table below. You can sort the table according to the information you are interested in.

Regarding the Nikon fixed wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle full frame lenses, here are my 5 recommendations.

By releasing this lens, Sigma has achieved the amazing trick of offering an excellent lens quality, which is not easy for a focal length lens of this type. It also offers an incredible aperture of f/1.4, which neither Nikon nor Canon had tried before.

Its image quality is very good at full aperture and even becomes excellent once the diaphragm is slightly closed with a very sharp center and remarkable edges. The ideal lens for wide-angle fans who especially like landscapes and often shoot in low light conditions as well as astrophotographers.

Another Sigma! The brand has distinguished itself by releasing this Art range, and this 24mm is a worthy representative of it since it allows itself the luxury of surpassing the Nikon and Canon models on many points.

Very good at full aperture, it becomes excellent very quickly once the diaphragm is closed by barely a notch to deliver stunning images at medium apertures. Its price is almost half the Nikon’s, which doesn’t spoil anything. Among all the 24mm currently available in DSLRs for Nikon, if you are looking for the best, look no further!

The latest lens in the f/1.8G range released by Nikon. Its fourth place in the ranking is mainly due to the fact that it costs the same price as the Sigma for a smaller aperture.

However, its optical quality is at the same level as the Sigma, it is much more compact which makes it above all much lighter. If you don’t need an f/1.4 aperture, it’s THE 24mm to have at Nikon. Its construction is also very neat with a gasket on the bayonet, unlike the Sigma.

The f/1.8 lens with the shortest focal length at Nikon. It is perfectly in line with the f/1.8G range of the brand, a rather light lens with a serious construction although plastic appearance and good performance.

Compared to the Sigma f/1.4 for the same price, it is a slightly less good quality but has other assets. Like the 24mm, it is much lighter and less bulky and allows the use of screw-in filters, unlike the Sigma. A very good choice, therefore, to consider if you don’t need the f/1.4 aperture.

One of the shortest focal lengths if we don’t take into account the fisheye, this 14mm stands out for its maximum aperture, the largest you can find on a 14mm.

It delivers very good performances, superior to the 14mm f/2.8 offered by Nikon and Canon which have aged quite a bit. If you have the use of a 14mm and the conditions or the type of pictures you take require a large aperture to capture more light, this lens is for you.

The table below lists the main characteristics of the 5 wide-angle fixed-focal lens for a Nikon Full Frame camera body. The table can be sorted by clicking on the desired columns.

Here are in my opinion the 5 best zooms and the 5 best fixed focal lengths available for Nikon full frame DSLRs. Some of these lenses have a curved front lens which prevents the use of screw filters. You will therefore have to use adapted (and usually very expensive) filter systems. I wrote a very in-depth article on filter holder systems adapted for wide angles.

The lenses listed in the paragraphs below as alternatives are summarized in the table below.

Some of these optics may not be to the taste of some, or too expensive. As for the possible alternatives, here are some perspectives to consider.

For a bright ultra wide angle zoom other than the Tamron and Sigma, you can of course choose the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G although in my opinion, it’s not worth the price anymore. A good alternative remains the Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4, offered at a very affordable price with a nice aperture, all for a serious very light construction (450g) and a good image quality.

Finally, there is the Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G, the lightest of its category (385g) but which remains in my opinion too expensive since for 33% less, we find the Tamron 17-35mm, with a larger maximum aperture and more performant.

Regarding prime lenses, there are few recent lenses that are interesting compared to those shown in the table. Nikon offers a 14mm f/2.8D (old), and moreover at a much too high price. If you’re really interested in a 14mm but you can’t afford Sigma Art, you should rather consider the 14mm f/2.8 AF from Samyang/Rokinon recently released, at least as good and much cheaper than the Nikon.

In the old lenses, Nikon also has a 20mm and a 24mm f/2.8D, both still quite good especially at medium apertures, with not-so-sharp edges at the largest aperture.

As with Canon, the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8, 18mm f/2.8 and 21mm f/2.8 lenses are often considered collector’s items, except that a collector’s item is more for display, whereas these are intended to provide you with images of remarkable quality. But like all collector’s items, they are also very expensive, especially since they will impose a less comfortable manual focus even if, on this kind of lenses, it is not a big restriction.

For those who can’t afford these jewels, Samyang/Rokinon offers a remarkable 14mm f/2.8 MF that deserves all your consideration because it has nothing to envy to Nikon and Canon models except of course their autofocus.

Finally, the brand Irix made a lot of noise by introducing a 15mm f/2.4 lens. A lot of photographers are quite satisfied for this low cost wide angle lens (less than 500€). Two existing versions : Firefly and Blackstone.

The number of Nikon wide-angle lenses for mirrorless cameras, regardless of the size of the sensor, is relatively small, since the brand has only recently started using this type of body and has chosen to change frames for the occasion. Here are the few references currently available, including one with manual focus.

Since we published this article, we wrote a comprehensive article covering the best Nikon Z-mount wide-angle lenses.

At the moment, Nikon only offers a mirrorless camera, the Z50, and has not yet released a wide-angle lens for this format in this mount.

To further help you choose your lens, I invite you to read our page dedicated to the best current Nikon Z lenses.

Nikon’s entry into the world of mirrorless cameras is relatively recent. For the moment, you have in reference the 14-30mm f/4 S which is not very affordable but seems to be of very good quality, especially when closed a notch. Nikon has chosen not to put any stabilization in its Z-mount optics for the moment, assuming that the bodies have one on the sensor.

Regarding primes lenses, Nikon offers as in DSLR, a 20mm and a 24mm f/1.8 S, sold at equally high prices but with very good performance. The only current alternative to Nikon is the Samyang/Rokinon MF 14mm f/2.8 Z. This is a fixed focal length lens with manual focus at a much lower price (about 400€). You can nevertheless consider, through an adapter ring, to place your DSLR optics on your mirrorless camera body, but this will lose some of the interest of a mirrorless camera which is supposed to save weight compared to a DSLR. By the way, feel free to check out our page presenting all the Nikon Z lenses. You will find there the wide-angle lenses mentioned above but also other alternatives.

That’s the end of this article about the best Nikon wide-angle lenses for DSLR and mirrorless cameras, I hope I’ve helped you make your choice and, as much as possible, it will be updated to include the next releases. Do not hesitate to give your opinion on the choice of lenses presented in this article! For Canon fans, you will find on the same website the same article to present you with the best Canon wide angle lenses. For landscape fans, I invite you to read our complete guide about the best lenses for landscape photography.

See you soon,

Sylvain